web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/CombiningRenew/18-02-FAQs.pdf

archives

This URL has 1 public saves. The first save was Aug 4, 2026, 09:53 AM and the latest save was Aug 4, 2026, 09:53 AM.

View recent saves on this domain

Latest saved version

PNAS論文に関する訴訟に関する質問と回答

This is the newest public snapshot for this URL and the best place to start reviewing the page.

Aug 4, 2026, 09:53 AM

Source URL

https://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/CombiningRenew/18-02-FAQs.pdf

About this page

This document summarizes questions and answers regarding the lawsuit related to the PNAS paper (C17) published in 2017. Author Mark Z. Jacobson clarifies that the lawsuit was not filed due to disagreement with the scientific opinions of C17, but rather because the authors of C17 knowingly and/or recklessly published false statements of fact. The document details the reasons for the lawsuit and the failure of the C17 authors to retract their erroneous claims. Additionally, it presents findings from other studies supporting the stability of a grid powered by 100% renewable energy.

Total saves

1

Latest save

Aug 4, 2026, 09:53 AM

First save

Aug 4, 2026, 09:53 AM

Saved versions

web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/CombiningRenew/18-02-FAQs.pdf web archives are listed here. You can still review the saved screenshot and HTML even if the original page disappears.