traditionalmass.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/SedevacRefuted.pdf

Latest saved version

セデバカンティズムの反論と一般的な異議 (2004)

This is the newest public snapshot for this URL and the best place to start reviewing the page.

Source URL

https://traditionalmass.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/SedevacRefuted.pdf

About this page

This document examines common objections to sedevacantism, particularly addressing Rev. Anthony Cekada's response to Thomas Sparks' article titled 'Sedevacantism Refuted.' It emphasizes the distinction between ecclesiastical law and divine law, discussing how a heretical pope loses authority. The text critiques misunderstandings regarding papal election legislation by Pius XII and the concept of public heresy, clarifying that heresy constitutes a crime under canon law. Ultimately, it argues that a heretical pope loses his authority by violating divine law, thus providing a theological basis for the sedevacantist position.