Archive ready

主キーはもう「UUIDv7」一択なのか? 〜 ID技術の歴史的変遷と現時点の最適解 〜

https://zenn.dev/loglass/articles/c2db7e85702571
April 2, 2026 at 08:39 AM JSTThe archive page, viewer, and downloads use this saved version.
April 2, 2026 at 08:39 AM JST·zenn.dev

The evidence pack includes HTML, screenshots, summaries, and metadata. It can be downloaded on Pro.

Saved page

主キーはもう「UUIDv7」一択なのか? 〜 ID技術の歴史的変遷と現時点の最適解 〜

Open the archived HTML with saved-time metadata attached.

StartedApril 2, 2026 at 08:39 AM JST

This HTML has CSS and images embedded, so it can still be opened even if the original page disappears.

About this pageAI generated

This page discusses database primary key ID technologies, tracing their historical evolution and presenting current best practices. It compares various ID schemes including AUTO_INCREMENT, UUIDv4, Snowflake, ULID, CUID2, and UUIDv7 across criteria such as time sorting, distributed generation, guessing resistance, and database compatibility. The article explains limitations of sequential IDs—specifically single points of failure in sharding and security risks from predictability. UUIDv7 emerges as the modern optimal solution, offering time sorting, distributed generation, guessing resistance, and database compatibility. The recommended approach is adopting UUIDv7 for internal databases while using Base62 encoding or NanoID for externally exposed identifiers.

主キーはもう「UUIDv7」一択なのか? 〜 ID技術の歴史的変遷と現時点の最適解 〜 - Saved screenshot

The full page can be captured up to 15,000px in height so you can review the complete page layout when needed.