Archive ready

主キーはもう「UUIDv7」一択なのか? 〜 ID技術の歴史的変遷と現時点の最適解 〜

https://zenn.dev/loglass/articles/c2db7e85702571
April 2, 2026 at 07:39 AM JSTThe archive page, viewer, and downloads use this saved version.
April 2, 2026 at 07:39 AM JST·zenn.dev

The evidence pack includes HTML, screenshots, summaries, and metadata. It can be downloaded on Pro.

Saved page

主キーはもう「UUIDv7」一択なのか? 〜 ID技術の歴史的変遷と現時点の最適解 〜

Open the archived HTML with saved-time metadata attached.

StartedApril 2, 2026 at 07:39 AM JST

This HTML has CSS and images embedded, so it can still be opened even if the original page disappears.

About this pageAI generated

This page explores database primary key selection, tracing ID technology evolution from AUTO_INCREMENT to UUIDv7 as the modern best practice. Sequential IDs were simple and efficient but became bottlenecks in sharded and microservices architectures while posing security risks through ID predictability. The article recommends adopting UUIDv7 for internal database primary keys, while encoding externally exposed IDs with Base62 or NanoID for security. Various ID schemes are compared across time-sortability, distributed generation, predictability resistance, and database compatibility. For highly sensitive systems requiring timestamp obfuscation, CUID2 remains an alternative option.

主キーはもう「UUIDv7」一択なのか? 〜 ID技術の歴史的変遷と現時点の最適解 〜 - Saved screenshot

The full page can be captured up to 15,000px in height so you can review the complete page layout when needed.